|
Economic
and Market Commentary
July 2010
For those who just
want a concise summary of our thoughts, we have begun this version of our
quarterly commentary with the "Cliffs Notes" version of our economic
thoughts, followed by a lengthier discussion of our investment posture:
- Our view of the big picture environment we face in the next few
years remains unchanged. The recovery continues but is not inspiring, and
we see above average risk in spite of being early in a recovery cycle.
- The United States and other
countries with excessive household sector debt are in the early stages of
what is likely to be a long process of deleveraging.
- Most of these countries must also dramatically reduce public
sector (government) debt growth and in some cases they will need to reduce
the absolute amount of debt. This huge challenge has not yet begun.
- Three variables critical to improvement in private-sector
consumption and a normal recovery—the labor markets, credit growth, and
housing—remain weak.
- With the debt crisis in
Greece occurring when Europe’s recovery was already weak, the continent
faces a real risk of falling back into recession.
- Fortunately, key
parts of the developing world (emerging markets) are in much better shape
with stronger balance sheets, higher growth rates, younger populations,
and slowly emerging consumer sectors. Their strength is an important
source of support for the global recovery.
- Real time update:
Intel reported earnings and revenues last night that beat expectations,
which indicates that the recovery isn't falling apart as some "permabears"
prognasticate on TV.
For these reasons and
a few others, we are sympathetic to the view that we may be experiencing a
paradigm shift into a difficult period that does not include the robust
economic recoveries we’ve come to enjoy after recessions. It’s also an
environment that requires a high degree of intellectual honesty to think
through the ramifications, risks, and opportunities without being
constrained by a frame of reference based on the typical cycles, return
assumptions, and risk assessments that have characterized most of the
post-WWII period.
Capturing Returns and Protecting Capital—Our Investment Posture
Regardless of how
good or bad the macro picture, investment opportunities are determined by
whether they are priced attractively relative to their ability to generate
future growth and/or income. For this reason an investment can still be
attractive even if the macro outlook is dark, or unattractive even in an
extremely positive macro environment. In fact, it is common for investment
prices to be compelling in terrible macro environments due to investor
pessimism and poor in wonderful macro environments due to excessive
optimism. Unfortunately, today, as we face difficult macro issues, most
asset classes don’t currently reflect excessive investor pessimism.
In assessing the
potential returns, our scenario analysis approach has been invaluable, and,
we believe, a superior approach to traditional valuation analysis.
Traditional analysis does not take into account possibilities for future
earnings and dividend growth, changes in interest rates, and a range of
possible risk appetites that can impact investment pricing. Our scenario
analysis allows us to be forward-looking so that we can factor in a number
of possibilities that impact earnings growth, interest rates, and risk
appetites—which can vary significantly over any five-year period (our
decision horizon). One of the advantages of the scenario approach is that it
allows us to consider a range of outcomes when we make investment decisions,
rather than require us to correctly identify one specific forecast, which we
believe no one can expect to do consistently.
Stocks
We often hear
arguments about stocks looking very attractive relative to low interest
rates. At first glance this seems true, and it might fuel stock market
returns in the short run. But it is important to understand that interest
rates are low because the economy is very weak. Valuations in future years
(which will influence stock market returns over the next few years) will be
impacted by the future level of interest rates. If interest rates remain
very low three or five years from now it will mean that the economy
continues to be weak, which would not bode well for corporate earnings
growth and would be bad for stock returns. On the other hand, if the economy
picks up, rates will surely be higher and with risk of higher inflation
there is the potential for sharply higher rates. While moderately higher
rates would not be dangerously harmful to valuations, sharply higher rates
will make stocks less attractive versus other investments. Our scenario
analysis forces us to think about these relationships, their impact on
price/earning ratios (P/E), and their ramifications for stock returns over
our five-year investment horizon.
Emerging-markets
stocks, on average, offer somewhat better returns than developed-market
stocks in all scenarios we’ve analyzed. But currently the return premium is
not high enough to justify the higher volatility inherent in this asset
class.
Bonds
High quality
investment-grade bonds such as U.S. Treasuries and the highest quality
corporate issues offer minimal return potential over our five-year horizon.
What they do offer is a defensive investment that could perform well if the
economy is very weak or falls back into recession.
For this reason, our
fixed-income positions are not traditional. In total they are more
aggressive and potentially more volatile than a typical investment-grade
bond portfolio. However, compared to a traditional bond portfolio, we
believe our fixed-income positions will capture materially higher returns
and provide much better protection against unexpected inflation and in a
rising rate environment. And even though we expect more volatility in market
downturns, we don’t believe we are taking on much more risk in more extended
time periods such as two years, unless it’s an extended period of deflation,
which is a possibility though we believe the odds are still relatively low.
Alternative Investments
We have found two
open ended mutual funds with non traditional investment techniques that we
are interested in; however, we have not yet included them in client
portfolios. The potential attraction is that we believe the funds could
offer mid to upper single digit returns over a 5 year period with relatively
low correlation to stocks and bonds. But if the markets turn more
pessimistic in the short term, we would view equities as a more attractive
option. So we are being patient with making a final decision on these
funds.
Conclusion
Though we recognize a
positive investment scenario is possible, as is a temporary period of strong
market performance that could be driven by improving economic news and
impatience with the near zero return offered by money markets, we are
clearly not placing a high probability on a sustained bullish environment
for the next few years.
For some time now,
our view of the opportunities and risks for investors hasn’t been very
encouraging. The story is what it is. It is important to remember it’s not
forever—there will be better risk adjusted opportunities at some point,
probably sooner than later.
But if need be, we’re
prepared to be patient, and believe that our patience and willingness to
think outside of the box will be rewarded. In the meantime we are working
hard to ensure that when opportunities do present themselves, we are in a
position to recognize and take advantage of them, while also being highly
attuned to the potential risks in this uncertain environment.
< back
to articles
|